Sardonic Disconnection
16Oct/091

Moving Forward

I got the marks for my dissertation yesterday. To say I was pleased was an understatement. I didn't do so well in the first year of my MA and didn't expect to be able to recover. I did and, thanks to the kindness of the lecturers, I got what I wanted. Of course - I keep telling myself this - getting the marks was only the beginning. It's what I do now that really matters.

Today I took the first step and had another look at my synopsis. Breaking it down into, what could potentially be, chapters was a really useful exercise. I knew there were scenes that I was looking forward to writing, but seeing them all laid out in bite-size chunks was almost too much. I wanted to stop my day job right then and there and start writing. This I think is a good thing.

One of my biggest worries was that the plot I've got planned out wouldn't be enough to reach my target word count of 40k. It seems like this might be unfounded though. I've even found room to fit in my aborted prologue as a flashback!

It helps to think of it as the novel I will finish.

Maybe I should try affirmations.

Hah!

Onward!

Filed under: Writing 1 Comment
9Oct/090

The Human Connection

I enjoy fantasy. I love the visuals, that aesthetic and the escapism. But, most of all, the stories I love are those that show humanity at its best and worst. Fantasy allows a writer to extrapolate the real world to an extreme and explore the result.

Richard Morgan achieves this by setting his story, The Steel Remains, in a world where brutality is commonplace. The main characters don't fight for their queen, country, empire, proletariat or anything else. Each has a deep trauma that drives their actions. Then take Master of Whitestorm by Janny Wurts. Magic plays a huge part in the story, but at its core it's a tale of one man's quest to make the world safe for himself and others. The fact that his quest is spawned from the entirely human desire for revenge, which, when sated, grows into obsession, makes it all the better.

Do you need a fantasy setting for that? Maybe not, but it makes it a lot more fun. So is it wish fulfilment then? I think so, to a degree. As I was growing up I found myself, time and again, failing to stand up for myself. Today I have a tendency towards confrontation and argument. Do I just want to feel like I've won something? It doesn't really matter, but I think that's the root of my attraction to heroic fantasy. The stories I enjoy the most revolve around someone standing up for something they believe in, regardless of the cost.

I think that's one reason I dislike the stupid names that most fantasy authors feel the need to come up with. They detract from the humanity of the story and turn the characters into parodies. It takes a damned good author to make that work.

Filed under: Reading No Comments
1Oct/094

Sitcom Law

[Spoilers ahead]

Q: What's the number one rule of a sitcom?

A: The characters don't change.

Take The Office (British version). Ricky Gervais put the nail in the show's coffin by having his character become tolerable.The American version on the other hand is still plodding steadily into the future on the back of Michael being zany... over and over.

So how does The Big Bang Theory handle this? The Leonard and Penny romance was only ever going to work if either of the following was to happen. 1) Leonard became normal or 2) Penny became severely nerdy. This has been solved by having them sleep together anyway and ignore any of the logic that would make this possible. I think it helps that the audience are more interested in what Sheldon will say next rather than any other aspect of the show. The romance is almost inconsequential and certainly the least engaging aspect of the show. But then Big Bang Theory has always played free and loose with its "plot", so I guess it doesn't matter.

The question then becomes: How long can the show continue to run on the back of Sheldon's "issues"?

Filed under: Media 4 Comments